Your documents don't live on a local disk. Here's how txtfetch reaches them.

Every store below answers one question. Can it hand txtfetch a URL with no Authorization header, or do you send the bytes yourself?

One fact settles every row

txtfetch's ?url= parameter fetches a document server-side, but it sends no custom headers of its own. A store that can mint a URL needing no Authorization header lets ?url= reach it directly. A store that can't means you fetch the bytes with your own credentials, then POST them to txtfetch instead.

Nothing below is a benchmark of these stores. It's a map of one narrow, practical question: which path gets a document from each one into txtfetch.

the decision table

Google Drive, SharePoint & OneDrive, S3, Dropbox, Confluence, and a mailbox, compared
StorePre-authenticated URL?txtfetch pathLink lifetimeThe trap
Google DriveNo — Drive requires a Bearer header on every downloadPOST the bytesN/A — no public link ever existsA native Google Doc, Sheet, or Slide has no raw bytes. Export it first, and the export tops out at 10 MB.
SharePoint & OneDriveYes — @microsoft.graph.downloadUrl needs no header?url=Minutes — Microsoft warns it can expire fastThe URL might expire within minutes. Fetch it right before the txtfetch call, never from a queue or a retry.
Amazon S3Yes — a presigned GET URL?url=Your choice, set when you sign itSet the expiry longer than the async job can take, or a slow OCR pass outlives the link.
DropboxYes — the returned temporary link?url=About four hours, then 410 GoneRefreshing the access token that generated the link can cut a live link short.
ConfluenceNo — none is documentedPOST the bytesNot documented, and not a signed expiryThe download path has already moved once, from the v1 _links.download field to v2's downloadLink. Check the current API reference before you depend on either.
Email inboxNo — a mailbox has no download URL at allPOST the bytesN/AThe Gmail API's raw field is base64url-encoded text, not a file. Decode it before you write the .eml file, or txtfetch reads garbage.

Full citations, dated, live on each spoke below. See the error reference for what a failed fetch actually returns.

What ?url= can and can't do

  • It sends no custom headers. There's no way to pass an Authorization header on the fetch itself.
  • It rejects credentials written into the URL, like https://user:pass@host. A blocked address fails the same way.
  • It only fetches over http and https, on the default web ports.
  • It follows a redirect chain, re-checking every hop against the same rules, so a redirect can't smuggle past a header or scheme limit.
  • It runs under a fixed time and size budget. A source that's slow or huge fails the same way a broken link does, with a typed fetch_failed error.

See the error reference for every code ?url= can return, and async jobs & webhooks for how a slow source stays inside that budget.

No connector ships for any of them

txtfetch ships no plugin or connector for Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, S3, Dropbox, Confluence, or a mailbox. Each spoke below shows the whole path: fetch the document with the store's own API, then hand it to txtfetch. Already running on a no-code platform? See integrations for the platform side of the same wiring. For where the extracted text goes next, see ingest into a vector store.

frequently asked questions

Does txtfetch connect directly to Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, S3, Dropbox, Confluence, or a mailbox?
No. txtfetch ships no connector or plugin for any of the six. Fetch the document yourself, using the store's own API, then send it to txtfetch as a URL or a file.
How do I know if a store needs ?url= or a file upload?
Check whether the store can hand you a link with no Authorization header. SharePoint, OneDrive, S3, and Dropbox can. Google Drive, Confluence, and a mailbox can't, so you POST the bytes instead.
Why does ?url= work for some stores and not others?
?url= sends no custom headers of its own. A store that needs an Authorization header on every download can't be reached that way, no matter how the link looks.
Does txtfetch benchmark accuracy or speed for any of these sources?
No. None of these six is a text-extraction service, so there's no such comparison to make here. See /benchmarks for txtfetch's own measured extraction numbers.

Point it at your source files.

Pass a signed URL and the text comes back. There is no connector to install.

Get an API key →

See the URL docs →