txtfetch vs Unstructured.io

Unstructured.io is open-core etl for rag pipelines, priced per page. Here's the honest comparison — pricing math, capabilities, and where each tool actually wins.

at a glance

Unstructured.io

Billing
per page (pay-as-you-go)
Rate used below
$0.03/page
Free tier
15,000 pages/month free.

txtfetch

Billing
per document, regardless of page count
Rate used below
flat monthly quota — see plans
Free tier
500 documents/month, free, ongoing (Hobby plan)

capability table

CapabilityUnstructured.iotxtfetch
Billing unitper pageper document
Format coverage~25 file types1,000+ formats (Apache Tika)
OCR for scans / images++
Table extraction++*
Complex layout fidelity~~*
Structured field extractionnot yet*
Self-hosted option+
Single HTTP endpoint~+

Vendor-published benchmarks are marked directional throughout — see sources below. * txtfetch notes: Tables come back as structured rows/cells, not flattened text: ?format=markdown renders GFM pipe tables, ?format=json returns table elements with a cells array. Output is clean linear/structured text, not a visual layout reconstruction — by design, but worth knowing. Structured markdown and element-JSON document output ship today (?format=markdown / ?format=json). Schema-defined field extraction — pulling typed fields per your own schema — is on the roadmap, not shipped. We won't claim it early.

the cost calculator

Per page vs per document, worked out.

A 300-page PDF is 300 units of billing to Unstructured.io. It's one document to txtfetch. Adjust the numbers to your own workload.

Unstructured.io

Pay-as-you-go API, standard tier · $0.03/page

txtfetch

Unstructured.io's figure is their cheapest OCR/base tier — forms, tables, and higher-fidelity models cost more on top. txtfetch bills a flat monthly document quota: the page count inside a document doesn't change your bill.

where unstructured wins

  • Purpose-built chunking strategies (by-title, by-similarity) tuned specifically for RAG retrieval, not just text extraction.
  • Open-source core you can self-host and modify if you need full control over the pipeline.
  • Deep partitioning options per element type (titles, narrative text, tables, images) for teams that want to post-process structure, not just plain text.

where txtfetch wins

  • Breadth: 1,000+ formats through Apache Tika, not a curated list of a dozen file types.
  • One HTTP endpoint — pass a URL or upload a file, get text back. No SDK, no async job polling required.
  • Priced per document, so a 300-page report doesn't cost 300x a one-pager.
  • A durable free tier (500 documents/month, ongoing) rather than a time-boxed trial.

What we don't claim yet: schema-defined structured field extraction or an uptime SLA. Those ship later — see the capability table above.

sources

Stop parsing. Start shipping.

Create an account and get an API key in minutes — the free Hobby plan needs no card.

Get started →